class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide .title[ # The death of online social networks ] .author[ ### David Garcia
ETH Zurich
] .date[ ### Social Data Science ] --- layout: true <div class="my-footer"><span>David Garcia - Social Data Science - ETH Zurich</span></div> --- # So Far - Computational Social Systems and new social data - Search behavior and future orientation - The Simmel effect and Social Impact Theory - Text and Sentiment Analysis: Theoretical basis and methods - Introduction to social networks - Terminology, adjacency matrices, measures - Centrality: degree, closeness, betweenness - The friendship paradox --- # The rise and fall of Friendster **Friendster** went from 80 Million active users to disappear completely. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22583/22583d6fbe5012c0a96ecf5816628bba1398b3ab" alt=""<!-- --> --- # The rise and fall of MySpace **MySpace** went from being valued more than 12 Billion USD in 2008 to be bought by [Justin Timberlake for 35 Million USD](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/jun/30/myspace-internet). data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b87ff/b87ff5a90e0b9e70269772d239f82ff9203fe668" alt=""<!-- --> --- # The rise and fall of Orkut **Orkut** was the first attempt of Google to launch an online social network. It was very popular in some countries but lost users to Facebook and it was eventually taken offline. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63f32/63f326b738ab08fa5df461e257554e0376f1a909" alt=""<!-- --> --- # The Google+ spike **Google+** was the much promoted second attempt at social networks by Google. Despite the initial hype, it lost users pretty quickly and it has been discontinued too. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77953/77953ebb04bb8d201e6e84f41dfdf1e2ba73ccd6" alt=""<!-- --> --- # Predicting Facebook's collapse .pull-left[data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aacc1/aacc1f09ab5646b2f445487cf892a857386a3f82" alt=""] .pull-right[ - Cannarella and Spechler, 2014 - Epidemics model applied to the decay of online social networks - Google trends to measure the number of active Facebook users - Extrapolation predicted that Facebook would lose 80% of its users by 2017 - What happened? ] --- # Stretching the Google trends method Data scientists at Facebook [replied to the Arxiv paper](https://www.facebook.com/notes/mike-develin/debunking-princeton/10151947421191849/) showing the problem with measuring social network use levels using Google Trends data. Applying the same methodology, Facebook researchers reached the conclusion that Princeton would lose 80% of its students by 2021: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13665/136654cd36c91222b7d0dfc8c0259c74675825ce" alt="" --- # Stretching the Google trends method You can even apply it to air and come to the conclusion that the atmosphere will run out of air by 2060: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8770/e8770eca38d36885ba3078f91256590918d93d03" alt="" --- # Google trends for Facebook The Facebook examples show that decrease in search volume is a decrease in information searching about the social network, not a decrease in access and use. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3c00/f3c0027dd0d618c18d86dfa81fd4b19d37c9f996" alt=""<!-- --> --- # Google trends for Twitter Twitter is not living a second growth, in fact it's growth has been rather slow to stagnant for a few years, even though it appears it is gaining users after Trump's permanent suspension. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11a6a/11a6a149ff715d70a47f8028c4b0540dce6b165b" alt=""<!-- --> --- # Temporal validity issues </br> A more accurate way to measure activity in a social network is Bruno Ribeiro's [approach using Alexa data](https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2566486.2567984), but Alexa focuses on website visits without considering access through mobile apps. </br> Measurement is always an important issue in Computational Social Systems, and just because a paper used a measurement method few years ago, it does not mean it is valid today. </br> > **Take home message:** Your measures based on today's digital traces might not work on tomorrow's